Thu 6 Sep 2012
Roadkill & Two Veg
Posted by anaglyph under Australiana, Daft Advertising, Food & Drink, Photography, Tragedy, Travel
[12] Comments
A little while ago, Violet Towne and I drove up to Sydney as we sometimes do. It’s about a ten hour trip and we’d usually make it in a day, but this time we decided to break it by leaving on Friday night, driving for a few hours and stopping on the way at at a motel at which we’d made an online reservation. To save the proprietors from embarrassment, I’m not naming names, or even putting a pin on the map, but suffice to say the place we chose was a sizeable establishment in a largish country centre with more than enough reason to know what constitutes modern expectations of hospitality. Somehow or other I ended up on their mailing list. I’m not really sure how this happened, as I’m usually fastidious about not handing out my personal email address unless it’s absolutely necessary. I suspect that they got it through the online booking form, even though I opted out of any email ‘notifications’ as I always do.
Whatever, I know they now have my details, because this morning I got a cheery update from them, espousing the wondrousness of their restaurant’s new menu. Viz:
Bonzo’s ((Name altered to protect the innocent.)) Restaurant & Bar has recently launched the new menu with brand new dishes created by Head Chef, Hattie Bonilla ((Ditto.)) and her team with an emphasis on The Grill. The Grill has a big variety of steaks in all sizes and cooked to your liking with your choice of sides and sauces to provide you with the ultimate meal.
Then follows what we must assume is meant to be a pictorial representation of ‘the ultimate meal’ (completely unaltered from how it appeared in the email):
Oh, my absinthe-addled one-legged maiden aunt. Could they possibly have made something look any less appetizing? This must surely be the best example I have ever seen of what NOT to do when photographing food. Here at the cusp of the visually hip 21st Century I find it almost impossible to believe that anyone could achieve anything quite so awful unless they actually set about it intentionally. Why, even the average iPhone meal snap looks tastier (and more professional) than this.
These two blobs of anonymous meat cuts, flanked by iridescent plasticized broccolini and a smear of… what is that – industrial sealant? Baby poo? – served up on a medical specimen tray and bleached out by a blinding flash of light on a morgue table are less a depiction of a tastebud temptation than a snap from a crime scene. And for Christ’s sake – how about a second shot to at least get the whole thing properly framed? It’s not like it will cost you anything!!!
That does not look appetizing at all. I’d have to say it looks rather the opposite. I was hunger before I saw that. Now, not so much.
That’s not a typo. I was so hungry that I felt, for a moment, that I might be hunger itself.
Thanks magic internet weight-loss tool!
Hey. Maybe we’re onto something here.
Malach? Is that you?
Yep … it looks pretty much like the ultimate meal to me… in the proper sense of the notion.
Ahahaha. So THAT’s what they meant.
As a father of 2, I can contest that baby poo is generally much darker in colour than that blob of whatever. Maybe it’s spray foam insulation mixed with turnip. Either way, it’s an appetite killer.
I’m not confident that the colours represented here are indicative of reality. I’m still saying baby poo.
I can’t disagree with you there. At second look, the colour’s off or the meat’s off.
Yuck!! Most professional food photographers use hand made models, painted and touched up to look appetizing. They should have at least photo shopped this dogs breakfast.
Actually, having been involved in food photography for advertising a little, I can tell you that (at least here in Australia) there are VERY strict rules about what you can and cannot do in presenting your food in a photograph (in advertising at least – it’s obviously not so critical in a cook book or something*)
For instance, McDonald’s is bound by a book full of regulations of how it must present its food – and it runs up against the law often. It must show food that looks like a reasonable example of what someone would expect when they opened their burger. I don’t know if you remember, but once there was a HUGE variance between advertised McDonalds’ meals and what was in the wrapper. Now, not so much (because the ad standards are more strictly applied).
So, while food photographers are permitted to use some things as models (ice is one example) they use real food as a rule.
*And really, these days it’s not hard to get appetising photos of food. I can do it (and have done) with my iPhone on my kitchen bench. This fact makes this horrible mess even more appalling.
Blimey
I’ve seen better meals on airlines – back when they served food in cattle-class, that is.
Having entered poverty (against my will BTW) I don’t go anywhere these days.
And now have proof that I’m not really missing very much.