Thu 9 Nov 2006
Mumbo Jumbo ++
Posted by anaglyph under Hokum, Skeptical Thinking, Sound, Stupidity, Technology
[28] Comments
OK. Now I’ve found something that tops even the Steorn bozos’ concepts for sheer technical daftness. Or downright thievery – you decide.
Over at Creative we find this offering for those who don’t have two brain cells to rub together (but plenty of excess cash, I guess) – the ‘Xmod X-Fi Module’ for your PC that actually ‘improves’ your lousy computer sound to an ‘experience beyond studio quality’.
Let me just rephrase that for the slow learners: you stick this gadget in between your mp3s and your speakers and the sound comes out better than the studio recording of the original track!
Shit, I’m going to buy twenty of these and give them to all my Pro Sound buddies. If it can make mp3 sound better than studio recording, then it follows that it can make studio recordings sound better than angels singing the glories of God and His Creation!*
Consider this assertion on the website:
•Restore the details and vibrance that your music lost during MP3 compression
Disregarding first of all that ‘vibrance’ is not actually a real word, let’s examine this claim. First of all, a simplified technical lesson: mp3, or MPEG Audio Layer 3, is a format which is known in the business as a ‘lossy’ form of compression. What this means is that some clever technical hocus-pocus is used to take an audio file and compress it in such a way that some of the less important original data can be thrown away to make the file smaller but (hopefully) without a listener being able to notice too much of a reduction in fidelity.
The key term here is thrown away. To get an audio file (say a CD quality file) down to a much smaller sized mp3, savage and ugly chopping has to be done and the unwanted data is irretrievably blitzed. Chucked. Trashed. Flushed. Things from the original audio file no longer exist in the mp3 file.
Our friends from Creative are claiming that they can somehow reconstitute this no-longer-extant data – raise it from the dead, so to speak – and set it walking among the living once more. Not only that, they are saying that the mp3 will not only sound as good as the CD you ripped it from, but better than that.
There’s a highly technical term for this kind of thing, and that term is CRAP!
In order that they might convince you of their highly dubious hyperbole, Creative offer you the chance to actually hear X-Fi in action. Going on the provided example I might make the suggestion that they should abandon the waffly try-hard ‘X-Fi’ moniker and go for the much more accurate ExcrementSoundâ„¢ label. Using a breathtakingly cliched Flash presentation, the Creative people show us how their X-Fi system can take a perfectly ordinary and dull piece of music and sound like a perfectly ordinary, dull, and sibilant piece of music. Huzzah! They’ve discovered the treble control. Now instead of that fuzzy futzing aliasing of the high frequencies in an mp3 you can have nicely fizzy, ear-scouring futzing aliasing. Wow. Better than studio sound! I know – I try every day to get my sound to be this unpleasant, but fail comprehensively.
Oh, I just can’t go on. The only thing that’s creative about Creative is their ability to effectively recycle that old saw: Never give a sucker an even break.
___________________________________________________________________________
*This is a colourful image for comic effect. I do not believe in Creation, angels or God.
___________________________________________________________________________
28 Responses to “ Mumbo Jumbo ++ ”
Trackbacks & Pingbacks:
-
[…] But today I’m going to examine the simplest, and perhaps the most exploited of all hi fi components: speaker cables. The hyperbole spouted by the vendors of these products is voluminous. Their ‘oxygen free, polarized di-electric, elevated-off-the-floor, cryogenically chilled’ cables will make your muddy cloth-filtered music sound like it’s been triple-washed in Persil! It’ll come out of the speakers at a fidelity beyond studio quality! […]
-
[…] But today I’m going to examine the simplest, and perhaps the most exploited of all hi fi components: speaker cables. The hyperbole spouted by the vendors of these products is voluminous. Their ‘oxygen free, polarized di-electric, elevated-off-the-floor, cryogenically chilled’ cables will make your muddy cloth-filtered music sound like it’s been triple-washed in Persil! It’ll come out of the speakers at a fidelity beyond studio quality! […]
I’m sorry Rev. I know stupidity like this must hurt you, but just know that when all the stupid people spend all their money on X-Fi then surely they’ll have less left over to reproduce with… right? (Can only hope). Then again, I thought vibrance was a real word so it’s a good thing I’m not in the market for a baby.
Unfortunately Bean, it does not take any money at all for two stupid people to get together and breed more stupid people. This is a sad fact of evolution.
And I guess I’ll allow some usages of ‘vibrance’, in the spirit of linguistic evolution, but it should properly be ‘vibrancy’.
While I agree that it’s impossible for X-Fi to make your music sound better than studio quality, the soundcard is still lightyears ahead of any onboard audio system on a PC’s motherboard. It also sounds very good for games that support surround sound or EAX. But what do I know, I’m only a sucker.
Sounds good to me.
BWAHAHAHAHAHahahahaha!
Sorry. I felt a sudden urge to leave a pointless, inane comment and – well. There ya go.
This is great news, now maybe my five year old pirated copy of CakeWalk running on my shitty Dell will sound almost like I spent money recording something.
Thanks Creative!
jmf: What you’re saying essentially is that this just makes the sound less crappy as opposed to really crappy (although even that’s debatable judging from Creative’s Flash example). Let’s be in no doubt about what I’m contesting here though – it may well be that they have made some perceptual alterations of lousy PC sound to make it a little more palatable. Techniques like aural ‘excitement’ and harmonic low frequency enhancement (which is almost certainly what they are doing, in conjunction with some phase tricks) have been around for years, and judiciously used, they can improve definition of sound in some ways.
But let me give you a visual analogy of what’s happening: take a small blurry image in Photoshop, crunch it down to 72dpi. Now blow it up to screen size. See all the blur? See all the compression artifacts? OK – now apply the PS ‘Sharpen’ filter a few times. Does that miraculously look like a high-def image to you? No? This is effectively what the X-Fi is doing in an audio sense.
What Creative are certainly NOT doing is making the sound ‘better than studio quality’. To claim this is just pure bullshit. It defies all commonsense.
Jam: Sorry, did you say something? I say what? Speak up son! (Nice boy, but sharp as a bowling ball).
Casey: You’re still not getting it. Your old Dell is going to sound BETTER THAN STUDIO QUALITY! This gadget is the homeopathy of sound! Ditch all your other audio gear Case, this is ALL you need!
Isn’t ‘Vibrance’ the new scent from the creators of Cowlex?
Rev,wish I had a hobby horse as sturdy as yours….
Cissy Strutt: Tut! Of course! How could I have forgotten?
WolfMAN: DON’T get me started.
Damn. I suppose that means my “meditate deeper than a zen monk” headphones are only filling my head with the sound of one grand crapping?
You know there are always suckers out there who will buy anything when the advertisement sounds as good as this one does. I think they are trying to hone in on the Average Joe who doesn’t do his research or who knows bugger all about sound quality. I’m guessing this amounts to a LOT of sales for them.
I bought one for home AND one for the office.Sherlene bought one for the Campervan too.We all find it much better than Pro Tools.
evenstar: “Meditate Deeper Than a Zen Monk INSTANTLY…” You forgot the INSTANTLY! No more of that annoying messing about with a lifetime of learning…
Mish: Hey soldier! Long time no hear!
AVERAGE JOE: I bet Sherlene’s into homeopathy too.
Argh! What’s up with me today?! Thanks for cleaning up my mess too Rev – I promise not to do that at your place :)
Anaglyph:yup! Sherlene bought the Perpetual Ocean Salts for her bath.They done good things for her verrucas! I aint afeared to give her a foot rub no more.
AVERAGE JOE: Just don’t go sucking on her toes.
…which would explain the tongue warts,I figures.But I’m hoping X Fi can help me wit that too.Or do I need a dose of MP3 Doc?
I think you already have a dose of mp3.
So let me get this straight, I record some beautiful music at 192k at 24 bit through Genex converters to a Pro Tools HD system, mix it down through an expensive desk to a pristine final mix. It then gets encoded as an mp3 at 128kbs, I pass it through this device and it will sound better than the source material? Well, I might as well give up my day job right here and now!
I am glad that the Reverend has a Soap Box to stand on and that he fights for Truth Justice and the Aussie way,otherwise these people might just get away with it.
Sadly, hewhohears, I think these people are already getting away with it…
Hewhofears:Sherlene akses if’n you can come round the campervan an ‘splain that in non-high-falutin language.I reckkin ifin ya day job is rippin the testes of young calves,then you may as well look for summit else.
Good gods…
I come from the camp of really, just give me some vinyl and call it a day…, so I think I’ll pass on the BETTER THAN STUDIO QUALITY digital. Phooey!
You know what it is — just another way to approach the LCD. Take out the uniqueness of each recording and then ‘improve’ it with standard formulaic BS.
Cheers, Rev…
tp
Just a quick note on the Vinyl debate. I was brought up in the time of records and I couldn’t wait for them to go away. Unless you had a $4000.00 turntable, a dust evacuated room and wore non shedding gloves, you would always get crackles and pops. This did more to interrupt my listening pleasure than the quality of the record. I also firmly believe that digital recording can sound as good, if not superior today to analog recordings if a great engineer takes the care to record knowing the limitations of Digital. The problem is that the delivery systems at the consumer end are woefully inadequate. Mp3 are basically junk (as are any form of compression algorithms, though some are more palatable than others). And, Yes I use them for general listening, but not critical listening. The loundess wars have also taken their toll on the modern recording, compare the following small example: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.01/play.html?pg=2 Bob Katz the famous mastering engineer also has some graphs that show how the loudness wars have escalated in the past 10 years are music has suffered greatly.
So in closing, it was impossible to physically do this Uber mastering on Vinyl so they sound more dynamic as a result. If there was a consumer 96k/24 bit non compressed format and Artists could resist using every single bit at their disposal, I would predict that we would have recording that surpassed those old scratchy vinyl records.
my 0.02c worth
call me a tit, but i still think vibrance sounds more like proper english than vibrancy. but maybe that’s because i keep reading taiwanese ad copy that says things like “the most excellency sound card in the world.” makes me cringe not just a little, because i can’t tell them excellency isn’t a word, just that, in the words of fezzik, “you keep using that word… i do not think it means what you think it means…”
tit: You’re a tit. Well, you asked me to say it. We at The Cow are very obliging.
Stop by any time for more insults!