Mon 27 Aug 2012
Loyalty
Posted by anaglyph under FREE!, Grumpy Old Man, Idiots, SmashItWithAHammer
[28] Comments
Faithful Acowlytes. I want to speak to you today about loyalty. Oh, no no no – not your loyalty dear friends. I would never call that into question. No, specifically, I’m talking about the mechanism that seems to have become an integral part of pretty much every consumer commodity transaction on the planet: the Loyalty Scheme – or Loyalty Scam, as I prefer to call it, because the concept is essentially a swindle. If you are voluntarily ((In some cases you have very little choice. Credit cards almost universally include loyalty schemes in the form of ‘reward’ points – you literally can’t not be involved in one.)) taking part in a loyalty scheme of any kind, you’re being tricked.
I must confess, I didn’t really think much about this situation until fairly recently. As many people do, I just accepted the notion as a little extra perk that you got with your shopping experience and I dutifully had my various cards swiped, stamped or checked as I went about my shopping chores. And then, one day I had an interesting experience that threw some illumination on how retailers understand the concept of loyalty.
The incident in question involved a juice place in the local shopping centre. We’ll call it ‘Joos’. I would, on occasion, buy a juice from Joos as I was passing, and one day with my purchase I was given a little card. Apparently the object was to have it stamped each time I got a juice and then I would be rewarded after my tenth stamp with a free juice! How awesome is that! If you do the sums, that’s 10% off each juice I purchased. Well, I kept the card in my wallet (crammed at that time as it was with a dozen other Loyalty cards) and eventually, after a thirsty summer ((It’s not like I frequented this place often. It was an occasional stop on my shopping trips.)) I had accrued ten juices and I went to collect on my free one.
“Oh, I’m sorry,” said the hip young Joos counter kid, “We don’t use that system anymore. Now we have a swipe card. Would you like one?”
“No,” said I, “I would like the free juice to which I’m entitled on account of my loyalty.”
“I can’t give you one – that system is out of date. You have to use the swipe card.”
“I see,” I said. “And when does the swipe card go out of date?”
The sarcasm was lost on her.
It got me to thinking. If Joos really cared about its customers – ALL its customers – why does it not simply mark its prices down by 10%? Surely these lower prices (at the usual Joos quality, of course) would be a big incentive to keep customers coming back to Joos! This is the sum effect of having all your customers in the loyalty scheme after all. The fact is, the reward system is nothing more than sleight of hand to make you think you’re getting value where there is none at all. Joos doesn’t care about their customers enough to pass on a substantial saving across the board, but is instead selling them the illusion that they are being faithful to the brand by making them go through a silly charade with a swipe card. They are, in effect, bribing you to be a customer. Wouldn’t it be something if customers were loyal simply because Joos was offering a great product at reasonable prices?
All loyalty/reward systems operate in the manner I’ve described above, to a greater or lesser extent. You need to keep in mind that the reduction in price conferred by these systems must be accounted for in the profit structure of the company offering them, anyway. The prices of a product have effectively been increased to offset any deficit that the reward scheme might have – in other words, the company doing the offering is selling an illusion that you’re getting a deal, when in fact they could offer you that ‘deal’ as a fairer price if they wanted to. ((There is also a level of scumminess that comes with the scamminess, as I’m sure you’ve encountered, where the ‘reward’ is somewhat underwhelming when you actually collect it. For example, my local vet sells a cat food dental product that I buy in 3 kilogram bags. “Do you want to be part of our loyalty scheme?” asked the vet assistant, when I bought my first one. “You get one free bag for every six you buy!” It sounded good, so I signed up. Imagine my disappointment when I reached the sixth bag and was given the free one – not, as I expected, a complimentary replacement for my usual 3k bag, but a miserly 500 gram one instead. Yes, technically ‘a free bag’ but really a grudging and tight-fisted swindle. Honestly, I don’t know how vendors can treat customers with this kind of contempt.)) ((Oh, and let’s not even start on Frequent Flyer points…))
So here is what I want you to do, my intrepid Cowmpanions, when next you’re out shopping and someone offers you one of these ridiculous Loyalty cards. I want you to look that person straight in the eye and say:
“My dear Sir/Madam, if you want my loyalty, all you need provide is efficient, polite service and reasonable quality goods at sensible prices. If you do that, you won’t ever have to bribe me to come back to your store.“
28 Responses to “ Loyalty ”
Trackbacks & Pingbacks:
-
[…] 13th bottle free (or something along those lines). Well, I’m not a big fan of loyalty schemes as you know, but hey, if that kind of thing floats your boat, go for it. It’s scamming by any other name, […]
Yup. Agree. I’ve never thought a 10% discount is worth going out of my way for unless it’s on a purchase over $100. My experience in business however, shows I am definitely in a small minority.
Marketing techniques based on loss aversion have conditioned consumers to salivate at the thought of saving a few cents as thoroughly Pavlov conditioned his dogs. Consumers now are so price sensitive that they think nothing of making a 30min round trip to save 1.5c a litre on fuel or using credit cards in the post xmas sales to grab those “bargains” they’ve no cash for or buying cheap Chinese junk that needs replacing ten times as often as a better item that sells at five times the price.
Loyalty schemes (and stupidity) are here to stay!
I believe that all these marketing tricks – in fact, all the swindles and sleights-of-hand that we encounter in our everyday lives – have a downward pressure on our general humanness. It says to everyone “It’s fine to cheat and swindle and hide the truth, as long as you are clever enough not to get busted”. Well, I don’t think it’s fine. I believe that this kind of attitude is why we end up with the Morgan Chase & Lehman catastrophes. We berate these huge financial institutions for this behaviour, but we totally fail to understand that these small nickel & diming techniques are exactly the same kind of thing.
Absolutely. Although all these enticements (including the honest, legitimate ones) depend on well established psychological principles and so prey on our “human nature”.
You’re onto something when you say they “have a downward pressure on our general humanness” though: Research seems to indicate that Loss Aversion comes from the limbic system….
Wouldn’t it be great if marketers used schemes that elevated our human nature – like rewards for the customer’s generosity or humbleness or altruism? Instead, you get rewarded for being greedy and money-grubbing. No wonder we have a completely fucked up culture.
…and on that note >> http://youtu.be/r0s4g1Yh5vw
Oh crap. I read the some of the comments on that video. Moron Youtubers trying to come to grips with Leonard. It’s just fucking depressing.
JOOS?!?!?
Cocksucker.
Actually, I just did a search and there IS a Joos that makes juice. This should not be inferred to be the same company as the one I talk about in the post – I just pulled that name out of my ass. I shoulda known.
Yep, it’s scam. And I get more than a tad cranky when supermarkets (independent and Big Boys)have “fatastic savings!!!!!” on crap like two litre bottles of soft drinks that don’t benefit anyone but the manufacturers and dentists and Jumbo Bags of crisps and other non-essentials.
I’d rather see the regular prices of the staples be lowered. And stay lowered!
I always say no thank you to offers of silly cards.
And my credit card points? I’ll roll them back into my account or maybe sign them over to a charity.
(But I do like the skull stamp!;-)
Why thank you. If you collect 23 Cow Skull stamps on your Acowlyte Loyalty Card, you are entitled to one free comment.
Interesting idea. Efficient, polite service in an Australian retail outlet. Perhaps someone should try it one day.
It would be something, wouldn’t it? Maybe someday some canny marketer will perceive it as a potential commercial advantage.
No more comment nesting! Yeah – I make it a policy never to scroll to comments on YT. Life’s too short.
Oh, it’s far worse than you describe for large retail outlets. There are some worrisome privacy issues around the way the stores use data brokers like ChoicePoint to collect your personal targets you as a consumer. So your grocery store knows when you buy contraceptives, and beer, when you first purchased that athlete’s foot remedy, when you started buying more aspirin, etc.
There have been troubling incidences, too. GNC (General Nutrition Center) loyaty card members had their personal information compromised by some idiot in the management chain.
And, to add insult to injury it’s been shown that most stores increase prices for everyone, then offer discounts only for loyalty card members, negating any real value to consumers.
Here’s part of a fun story from a grocery web site (full story available only for members) about Robert Rivera, a fellow slipped and fell on spilled yogurt and sued the grocery store. The supermarket brought his beer purchase history to court in an attempt to prove that he was a drunk.
http://storefrontbacktalk.com/securityfraud/using-crm-to-defend-your-chain-against-lawsuits/
Perhaps things work slightly different up here, not sure, but my rebuttal would be Wal-Mart.
Wal-Mart gives those already reduced prices. People hate Wal-Mart for various reasons, but I think they provide the antithesis to your point. They have no loyalty card. They typically have the lowest prices on most things (not all, but most; especially ‘everyday’ items like foods – many of which are Wal-Mart’s own brands, even).
Wal-Mart isn’t the only mega-chain that doesn’t offer a scheme, as you mention. Dollar stores (Family Dollar, Dollar Tree, Dollar General) for example. They also tend to have very low prices on many things,, such that your X% savings are already factored in by comparison to those smaller stores that offer the rewards/loyalty cards.
Therefore, if a grocery store wants to be competitive with Wal-Mart, for example, it must have prices to begin with that are competitive. Most people don’t care about the quality of their meats, or who they buy their cereal from anymore. If GameStop (a company with a rewards program) charges more than Wal-Mart or Best Buy (BB has a rewards program) for example, then most people will shop at whichever place is asking the lowest price to begin with.
Although grocery stores have rewards cards, I think the more pertinent example up here at least would be gas stations. Some (like Speedway) have rewards cards; others (like Marathon) do not. If someone is going to buy fuel from them, they are looking only at the lowest price per unit. So, if Speedway can offer the same price as everyone in town, on everything from fuel to coffee (and they have to be competitive with McDonalds, which is likely not far away in most place, and which doesn’t have that rewards card), then people are going to know where to get their coffee and their fuel, and more often than not are going to buy whichever is cheapest, regardless of the program. The difference would be, then, if the coffee costs the same, and one place will give out a free one after 6 or 10, why not go to the one with a loyalty card, is what I think most people are thinking. Then again, we have certain laws now protecting gift cards and rewards cards and things of that nature up here that perhaps you don’t have an equivalent to.
To the main rebuttal though, Wal-Mart certainly is the antithesis, I think. People up here really hate them because the stuff is ‘not american made’ or ‘not supporting american business,’ but it doesn’t stop them from shopping there, either. There was one study which asked Americans if they would pay more for American-made goods, and found that almost everyone said yes. However, the study then looked at shopping trends and found that Americans don’t actually buy American made, even if the price is only a few cents more on whatever thing it is. If I were thinking a bit more clearly, I’m sure that this would make a clearer point, but it’s early and I am not.
The short rebuttal, then, is that I think Wal-Mart clearly demonstrates that a loyalty card doesn’t inspire loyalty, but also that people don’t necessarily find paying the lowest price to be the most satisfying, either. People may hate to admit it, but most people will shop at walmart because that 10% savings (sometimes a lot more) is already built in. Sorry I’m not more concise this time, but I think there’s a valid point to be made somewhat opposite the point you are making. Then again, I’ve never had anyone not give me the free thing at the end. Most places go out of their way up here to make sure that exact thing doesn’t occur, because that would mean a lost customer.
Although, now that I think about it, Wal-Mart does have the price matching guarantee, as lots of places do, where they will meet any (usually local) competitor’s price, even if it means taking a hit on it, because they know that this will also inhibit the same sort of loyalty, and will pay off in the long term. So maybe that counts as a loyalty program somehow? That’s perhaps convoluted, but I suppose it could be, except that those savings are also still offered to any customer.
*induce, not inhibit. I said it was early…
Pricematching is a whole ‘nother kettle of dishonest fish.
Frys is an electrical/electronic/computing store which pricematches even with the Internet. But its prices are generally worse than the net.
But for small purchases, I like the reassurance that I get from buying it at a nearby brick and mortar store, that if it’s faulty, they can replace it immediately. Years ago, Fry’s used to be pretty bad about this, but now they get that good service and reliable returns are their USP, so they’ve got really good at it. Well, OK, their USP is that they are a freacking-huge-warehouse-sized place full of nothing but toys to make the heart sing, but service and returns are what make people buy, rather than say “that’s sooo cool, I’ll make a note to buy that on ebay!”
I recently bought a UPS from them, I think I it cost around $700, and I was arguably wise to buy from Fry’s in this case, as the first one I got was non-functional: but that was fixed with a quick round-trip to the store, testing the replacement in-store this time. Buying on the net, the cost to return this hefty lump of metal would have been crazy.
But I’d seen it Amazon about $100 cheaper, even after delivery. So I read Frys’ price-matching T&C. Turns out they pricematch only against the delivered price (reasonable); and only from “authorised sellers of the product” (tricky to prove!).
So I went to them with two printed out pages: one of the page showing the price plus shipping, and one of the page on the manufacturer’s site showing their US partners, listing this other site right below Fry’s.
I approached one of the guys instore and asked how to do the price-matching thing, and they told me that I had to go to the assistance desk in the department for the product I wanted to match, and they’d do it there: if I’d got to the tills with the product, it would maybe have been too late.
Since it was his department, he processed it for me, and after checking both pages online himself, the guy was happy to price-match for me – his butt was clearly covered by my references, so he wouldn’t get in trouble for losing the company a hundred bucks of clear profit.
He printed a ticket; I took it to the checkout; they gave me the lower price.
But if I hadn’t checked in advance, and got rock solid proof that I fitted their fairly rigorous conditions of price-matching, and checked with an assistant what the correct procedure was, then I imagine I’d have been paying full price.
So why do they so heavily push the point that they price-match even against the internet? I see two reasons.
1) It makes people think their prices must already be competitive, if they’re willing to make that guarantee.
2) For those who aren’t suckered by that, they can make it too much hassle to pricematch for the little stuff that’s only going to be a few cents different. It doesn’t feel worth doing for a saving less than maybe $10, and 10% (which contradicts what people were saying about penny-pinching, on other comments, I know).
3) For those who aren’t suckered by that, they at least don’t lose a sale (and maybe a customer) to the internet, getting a smaller, or even slightly negative profit on a sale, but gaining it back on the other cool cheap gizmos that the person will buy in this visit, and all the future visits they make because of increased loyalty from the price-matching.
I need to get out of the habit or preceding lists with a comment mentioning the number of items in the list. Because I always add more.
Price matching is not nearly so complex up here. If I were, for example, to go to Best Buy (since we don’t have comp USA or circuit city or any of those anymore, and no Frys over here on this half of the continent that I am aware of), the price matching is fairly straightforward. I’ve done it a few times myself. The conditions are mentioned rather explicitly in a clear location. Best buy doesn’t match online in most cases,I think, but will actually call any local store or match any advert. Walmart is actually much more lenient, and will actually match at registers, too, and any ad, bee it online coupons, competitor coupons, or whatever. I do agree that buying big ticket items in person trends to be a better idea, though. Apparently up here and down there things aren’t quite the same in this regard. Perhaps the rev could test this out the next time he graces the states…
Also, blame the ‘smart phone’ for those lexical mistakes…
Price matching is a significantly different concept to that of the loyalty schemes though – it’s about margins. With price matching the retailer is essentially working out how much of its margin it can afford to lose to keep you as a customer. This is ultimately moderated by where it gets the product, which is, in all likelihood, from exactly the same wholesaler as its competitor does. So the bottom line is that as long as it sells the product to you at above cost and below the competitor, it’s winning. This is kind of like the inverse of the reward scheme, in which they are offering you a ‘fake’ incentive to keep coming to the store – most likely increasing the markup anyway, in order to ‘decrease’ it for you, the loyal customer (I mentioned that concept in the post and Russell reiterated in his comment).
Technically, there’s nothing wrong with that system. It is after all the basis for capitalistic economy; you make something and you sell it for a little bit more than it costs you to make it in order to make a profit (I do have some problems with the concept of ‘cheapest possible alternative’, but more of that in a bit)
The loyalty scheme, however, is more akin to the concept of a hedge fund in shares trading. It has nothing at all to do with the physical transaction of buying or selling a product, but is instead a mechanism that leverages the act of buying or selling itself. These kinds of ‘in-between’ agencies ALWAYS mean a loss for someone, and it’s never a loss for the people who engineered the mechanism.
As to the problem of ‘cheapest possible alternative’, I am always mindful that ‘cheap’ in money terms is not necessarily a good thing. As Doug pointed out in his first comment, buying something solely because it’s cheap is not a guarantee of value, nor of wise consumerism. Buying cheap products from China has arguably ruined many local Australian businesses who cannot compete with the labour costs offered by Chinese factories. If the quality was exactly equal between an Australian product and a Chinese one, you could argue that this is just a case of streamlined market forces winning out. The fact is, though, that many Chinese products are of inferior quality so purchasing a Chinese made spanner at $2 rather than an Australian one at $15 has two ramifications: you get a spanner that rusts in a year, rather than in 10 and you pay money into another country’s economy rather than into your own.
These actions all have effects that come into play sooner or later. Cheaper is not necessarily better, in my opinion.
That’s why I urge my Acowlytes to ask for ‘…reasonable quality goods at sensible prices’ I believe you should be mindful of exactly what you’re paying for.
I don’t disagree with that, mostly. Although, if I can buy a box of cereal at Wal-Mart for $2.99 or at the local grocer for $4.59, it doesn’t make much sense to purchase it at the grocer when it’s the exact same cereal. Cereal is perhaps not the best example. Sometimes, Walmart is more expensive, and it’s best to price-match. Perhaps the pricing disparities are not the same down there, but I suppose I could do some pricing surveys the next time I go to either one.
Naturally there is the issue of quality, but I wasn’t really trying to hit on it, since most all the stores carry the same brands and items. I think it’s better to buy at my local grocery/hardware/pharmacy/small business, but that’s in part because they are all within walking distance and Walmart is in the next city (the closest walmart is a 30 minute drive from here in any direction).
Although, that point was more tangential to the one I was trying to make (it was early, sorry) that the 10% less for the same thing versus using the loyalty card is reasonably analogous to comparing a grocery which participates in such a plan (or a gas station, as some walmarts even have those, and lots of grocery stores have them, too) to a walmart that does not. The walmart tends to be lower on most everything, even comparing the same brands.
Still, Walmart is such a hassle that, were I ever in the market for a lawnmower, snowblower, television, gaming console, or other big-ticket item that they may have, I may well consider buying it from a niche or small business simply because it would be simpler to deal with the staff there, even if the costs were slightly elevated.
However, most people anymore are not like me. Loyalty cards at grocery stores up here serve two purposes: fuel savings (most) and in-store savings. Working from this example, most grocery stores only give discounts on fuel, and most grocery stores that carry the cards have fuel pumps. A few grocery stores (more common on very large grocery chains, much less on local/small business ones) have the cards to give the direct savings at the till (although it is catching on). So the 10% as you mentioned in your original article is what wal-mart automatically saves you by not having it in the first place. Some grocery chains have higher prices for people who don’t use the card, and lower prices for people who do. When it comes to the ‘Buy n get one free’ type loyalty cards, mostly it’s gas stations and coffee shops that have that, but a very few other types of places will have it as well (notably tanning places). So, if you are buying a $.90 cup of coffee from place A or place B every morning, and place A has a free cup every so often (every n cups), but place B doesn’t, it’s much more enticing to get that free cup maybe once a week (as 5-7 are more common than 10 in this case). It scales up from there, obviously. Speedway (another gasoline chain up here) handles it differently, giving points on purchases that you can redeem toward things. Since their gas prices and food prices are just the same as the non-loyalty-card stations, it makes sense to use them. They also have the buy 6 get one free on coffee, hot items, cookies, et cetera. For the average person who just gets gasoline even, if they are paying $3.50 a gallon no matter where they go, but this place gives you 100 points on every $10 or whatever it is, which can maybe get you a free coffee or snack once a month, then why not use them? I think that’s the normal thinking behind it. I don’t disagree that it’s a bit of a scam, but I also don’t think that reducing the price in lieu of using a loyalty card would work much better, either.
Then again, Walmart does tend to have the lowest prices on just about everything, and lots of people do shop there.
I had to google Spanner. Apparently that means wrench? As a matter of comparison, let’s see…
http://www.sears.com/stanley-8-in-adjustable-wrench-wide-jaw/p-00973660000P?prdNo=1&blockNo=1&blockType=G1
http://www.walmart.com/ip/Stanley-MaxSteel-8-Adjustable-Wrench/14146069
They are, as literally as I can tell, exactly the same thing. Walmart, however, is $3.50 cheaper. This is, I think, why Wal-Mart offers the price-matching challenge, because they know it’s few and far between that most people are actually going to find a lower price on just about anything, anywhere, for the same thing (wal-mart won’t price-match on dissimilar items, as most stores don’t, I think, so it would literally have to be an exact widget, same brand and all). Sears and Walmart do both have their own credit cards, but Walmart doesn’t offer incentives like Sears does, so I think it still qualifies the same as a loyalty scheme. That’s all I was getting at.
As for buying things online, rather than physically, well, I’m quite sanguine about that. In Australia we have, since I’ve been a kid, faced significantly higher prices on most items imported from overseas (which is just about everything). The reasons initialy were that we’re so far away that shipping is expensive. Well, shipping is still expensive, but that cost is almost always split out from the item cost anyway – and the item cost is usually higher than anywhere else in the world. There are many reasons for this – one is that we have excessive (in my opinion) import duties. The reason for this is historical and has to do with protectionism of Australian products. This of course makes absolutely no sense if the product or any equivalent is not made in Australia. For instance, if I want to buy the newest Apple OS off the shelf in a box, it costs me significantly more than that box costs a person in the US. If I download the software from Apple, though, I pay the same as a person in the US. In this case, the only reason to buy the box from an Australian Apple store is if I feel like lobbing some dollars into the Australian Tax Office’s coffers. Since I already contribute quite heftily in that department, I see no reason to make a voluntary contribution.
This is changing though – non-Australian online retailers are somehow being strong-armed into increasing their prices for Australian consumers, for no good reason as far as I can see. I’m in the process of making a book of the Watching Europa project and I chose online print house Blurb to do it. For reasons that are impossible to fathom, Blurb has just started charging GST (Australian Goods & Services Tax) on all its books – a 10% markup. Since Blurb has no Australian presence other than a website and an office (presumably established for the sole reason of levying the GST) it’s perplexing as to why they think they need to apply this tax. The Australian Tax law quite specifically excludes imported goods of value less than $1000 from being tagged with GST. Blurb still manufactures its books elsewhere and imports them into Australia. So, in this particular case, Blurb is playing footsie with the Australian Government presumably because some idiot at Blurb was convinced by some rookie accountant that they should – this is a terrible thing for Blurb in Australia as they will surely lose all their Australian custom to Lulu or MyPublisher as a result.
Of course, should an ePublisher set up in Australia, offering the same service as Blurb, I will be more than happy to use them and pay the appropriate tax. But the logic of paying money to profit a foreign business while simultaneously paying local tax completely escapes me.
Ahh, that is unfortunate. Buying things online up here means they usually (but not always) also come from up here. I did think about buying some Campaign Coins once, when I was more into D&D. They are made on your continent (Melbourne, to be exact). If I wanted, for example, to purchase the $80 box set, the shipping for sea ($26) or air ($34) is not terrible, but as my past experiences with shipping things from anywhere not touching us by land, is that it can take an amazingly long time. I sent a package of goods to a friend in Japan once, and not only did it cost $55 for the flat rate priority, but it took weeks to get there, and part of it was broken by our US handlers (because our US mail handlers are usually the ones who break things, we are notorious for horrible postal service, and for good reasons). Being that I wouldn’t be in a hurry, that’s still quite a bit of money for something that doesn’t weigh over a few lbs. I can mail that from Maine to California for example in 5-8 days for half that price (or in a few days via UPS, say, for about that price). If I needed it priority from your country (still probably wouldn’t reach me for over a week), it’s around $75. So, the tax kills your imports, and the shipping kills your exports. That is another interesting dynamic up here. Things from China, for example, don’t have much in the way of taxes up here. Even things online we have benefits, I suppose, because we don’t have to pay VAT for Skype, for example (which I think, as a commonwealth, you might). This certainly is an interesting discussion.
Then again, we have just the opposite for taxes here. If a foreign company sets up a brick and mortar in Ohio (where I live), they can sell to any state in which they don’t have brick and mortar and avoid all sales tax. Foreign companies can set up offices here and avoid lots of import taxes we would charge as well. Apparently it’s not the same down there. Of course, then the business would have to deal with our bureaucracy, but that’s for an entirely different subject.
*well, not technically no sales tax, I guess, since then they’d be paying income tax on whatever they sell instead of tax to the government in foreign duties at the retail rates. It’s convoluted.