Tue 17 Jun 2008
Laugh? We Almost Did.
Posted by anaglyph under Blogs I Like:, Laughs, Philosophy, Safety Craig
[10] Comments
The little Commentary discussion we’ve been having about humour here and at one of my favourite hangs in the blog-o-sphere The Joey Polanski Show over the last couple of days, has prompted me to consider something that I never thought I’d find myself doing on The Cow, and that is attempting to explain something from the point of view of The Cow’s funny bone.
As you know, my mind turns to musing from time to time, about matters big and small, and when I’m not dreaming about helium-filled donuts, concocting perfumes that Satan might wear, or excoriating Scientologists, I sometimes find myself pondering the really BIG questions of the universe. Like ‘What is it that makes us laugh?’
Joey’s post a haff-dozn jokes I wishd I coud take creddit for attracted a whole swag of japes from the Polanski Show cast, most of the gags pretty darn funny, a couple of them brilliantly so, some of them definitely on the long-paddock side of politically correct, and a couple yer usual run-of-the-mill pub jokes. I posted a few of my own favourites but I was reluctant to put up my most favourite, The Bee Joke, because I know from experience that about half the people I tell it to just don’t find it funny. At all.
So I told Joey I’d put it up on The Cow instead, and corral the humour in its own stockyard, so to speak. In the Comments on The Bee Joke, Joey told what I will call The Centurion Joke as a riposte, and, it is (in my mind anyway) exactly in the same vein of humour as The Bee Joke.
I never really feel the need to defend or elaborate on my humour here on The Cow. After all, it is my joint and if you’re here drinking my beer I expect you to laugh at my jokes. Even if it is just out of politeness. Sometimes I know that I really do make you laugh (mostly because you tell me), but very often I don’t have a clue how funny anyone really thinks my writing is*. And since I like The Bee Joke a whole lot, I’m pretty obviously not the best judge of what other people find funny…
Of course, Tetherd Cow Ahead isn’t really meant to a repository for just my sense of humour, but because I find humour one of the most important things in my life it is inevitable that The Cow, being a fairly good representation of my character (I think), will end up with its fair share of gags. And, the current banter at The Polanski Show notwithstanding, mostly I try to keep my shtick as original as I can. In some cases the laugh-quotient has largely been reasonable as far as I can judge (like my ‘God Creates‘ series and my Annunciations), but there has been one notable lead balloon in the Cow Comedy Cavalcade, and yes, those of you who are regulars have spotted it already: ‘Safety Craig‘.
Sadly, no-one really ‘got’ Safety Craig. It may be just the way I told it, but I think probably it’s because the humour in Safety Craig is kinda like The Bee Joke and The Centurion Joke. And like those two gags, I doubt I can really explain Safety Craig, but I’m going to give it a shot:
For a number of years while I was living in Sydney I used to see a handyman truck around my neighbourhood – ‘Jim’s Mowing’ I think was the name of the business. It featured a do-it-yourself low-rent tone dropout picture of Jim and some ‘handpainted’ style text: ‘Jim’s Mowing: Ph: 12 34 2323’ or something. I just used to assume that ‘Jim’ was some local guy who was a bit better organized than your average tradesman.
Well, on moving to Melbourne, I discovered that Jim lives here as well. Only, in these parts Jim has a painting business. And a pet-grooming business, a plumbing business, a fencing business, a roofing business, a tiling business and even a permaculture business. Jim is one busy guy.
As you have guessed, ‘Jim’s’ is a franchise. Only, it’s a franchise that’s trying really hard to not look like a franchise.† Now, when I figured this out, I started to look at all the other businesses around that use these ‘posterized’ generic faces combined with some homely first-name for their logos and I realized that they are all franchises! In a weird and subtle way, the Reverend A, who likes to pride himself on his high quality skepticism and incisive critical thinking had been duped by a ploy so vacuous and insipid that he is almost embarrassed to admit it!‡
And then one day, now alert to all these cleverly constructed ‘cottage industry’ style companies to-ing and fro-ing across suburban Australia (and I have no doubt across the entire entrepreneurial world) I saw a display set up in a mall for ‘Safety Dave‘.
Something went ‘ping’ in my brain.
Now I’m sure that Safety Dave’s products are all worthwhile, just as I’m sure Jim, and Bob, and Carol, and Ted, and Alice, and all those other franchise denominators provide service of fair enough quality. Otherwise they wouldn’t still be in business. But the thing that made me feel slightly unsettled was that ‘Safety Dave’ and all these other friendly chaps and chapesses weren’t actually telling the truth about themselves. Well, not so much not telling the truth as letting the customer think something about them that wasn’t exactly accurate. And Safety Dave was asking us to put our safety in his hands…
Hence the invention of ‘Safety Craig’. The point is, of course, that Safety ‘Craig’ can’t get away with being anonymous, so instead of following the instinct to ‘trust’ him, as we might with ‘Jim’ or ‘Dave’ we must make our brains wary of his advice. And his advice is the kind our parents used to offer when we were kids, and is, on the whole, pretty much good sound advice, if a little annoying. So the contrast between those two things was supposed to be funny.
Like I said. Lead balloon. But now you know.
___________________________________________________________________________
*I’m talking about when I’m trying to be funny, of course. I don’t count the possibly numerous occasions on which people have found my serious ponderings mirthful.
†These days Jim’s looks a fair bit more corporate, and the logo a bit more ‘stylish’ as you can see by their website, but it wasn’t always so.
‡And so you see: such is my commitment to The Cow, that I am prepared to endure public ridicule in the service of truth!
___________________________________________________________________________
10 Responses to “ Laugh? We Almost Did. ”
Trackbacks & Pingbacks:
-
[…] as we’ve explored at length in previous Cow discussions, what makes a person laugh is a highly individual thing and so I don’t expect everyone to […]
I wonder if Safety Craig has any tips for a safe flying experience?
DANG, Revrend! It is almost creepy that you postd this when you didski.
Jus yestrday I was lookin at th Cow — specifickly at th list o categorys — and I fixd on ol Safety Craig. I thougt to myself, “Been a while since we heard from ol Safety. I wondr if th Revrends retird him.” Ocourse, I took a few bloggin naps durin th past year or so, and so I figgerd I mighta missd some “installments”; and so I clickd on that category and refreshd myself on what ol Safety hadta say. And dontcha know it? I foun myself doin a little impromptu analysis o that very gag! (Like I said … dangd creepy that you publishd this post … oh, around 5 hours aftr I was engagd in that little bit o musing.) Anyhow, I said to myself, “Yeah. There aint nothin funny about what SC has to say. And there aint nothin funny about th “company slogan” (“Safety first with Safety Craig”). So I kep turnin it ovr and ovr n my head, tryin to put my fingr on why, exackly, its funny. (And, fer what its werf, I do NOT classify it as a lead balloonski. Prhaps its one o them gags that can “kill” only once, tho.) And in my head I just hear this bewilderd voice goin — complete wif stammerin — “But … but … its bin Laden!” Guy concernd wif our safety. Craig. Safety Craig. Sensible message. Theres his mug. “But … but …”
Oh, yeah. Yeah, indeed, Revrend. Aint no way I dint “get it.” I coudnt a-guessd th backstory that motivatd the gag. But I sure got th gag.
BTW: Th genral message o this post is also dangd intresting. I, too, know th frustration when it seems like yer audience needs a joke explaind. (Happms a lot when you got em … I dunno … entrancd.) If somone truly needs a joke explaind to em, its pretty much a cinch that th “analysis” o th joke aint a-gonna make em laugh any more than th joke did; or their embarassment at not havin got it initially will not allow em to see any humor in it at all. Evr.
But I find — tell me if you evr have a similar experience — that sometimes I get as bick a kick outta an analysis of a gag as I do outta th gag itself. Two examples — tho I aint gonna cluttr this awready-too-long comment wif too much analysis — bofe from Monty Python. In MP & th Holy Grail, “King Arthur” and his toady are … ummm … ridin thru th countryside. Except they aint ridin. They aint got horses. Th toady gots some coconut shells, tho. Bangin em togethr. To make “hoof noises.” Arthur aint got em. Th toady gots em. Thats what hes there for. Now, try imaginin TWO things: (a) hownaheck th MP crew “hatchd” that whole concept. I mean, imagine th discussion at th conceptual stage. Th more I try to “re-create” how that mighta went, the more I end up laughin at th whole thing. Also try imaginin (b) how “Arthur” and his toady mighta came to their … ummm … their mutual undrstanding o their respecktive … ummm … tasks. Oh, shit … Im in hystericks now.
Next, take a look at MPs And Now For Something Completely Different. Check out th skit involvin Eric Idle applyin for a spot on John Cleeses mountain-climbin expedition. Analyze THAT, and tell me you aint bustin a gut. I mean, jus what EXACKLY is goin on there? Its as if evry time you think you figgr out “th premise” th premise gets evn less coherent. Funnyest thing I evr seen — seriosly.
Whew. Shit. I need a pill or sompm.
Atlas: Safety Craig says “Make sure you drink plenty of water! If your plane is hijacked, at least you won’t be thirsty!”
Joey: I am really fascinated by what makes us laugh. I’m especially interested in humour that lies on the edge, like the MP stuff you mentioned. And as Atlas knows, with things like League of Gentlemen.
I’ve turned The Bee Joke over and over in my mind and I still can’t figure out why I find it funny. I told it last night over dinner to Violet Towne and Viridian and Vermilion (the twins) and they all laughed, but we couldn’t agree exactly on why each of us laughed. The twins pointed out that it’s not funny if you don’t say the swear-word at the end. And they are right – if you tag the joke with ‘Yeah, but tough luck’ it’s a real pancake. Just like the Superman joke I told over at the JPS – you don’t say ‘cunt’, you don’t get the laugh.
But the Bee Joke, like the Centurion Joke, also relies on the fact that there’s some kind of callous disregard by one character in the joke for another. After all – it would not be at all funny to have been there and seen a Centurion chop off someone’s head (well, maybe for Centurions, I don’t know. But not for me). But in the Bee Joke, we’re forced into anthropomorphizing bees for Chrissakes. Like anyone knows anything about bee hive conditions and what a bee actually thinks about anything! So the farmer’s callous disregard makes you do a weird mental flip-flop that, I think, is what makes you laugh. Or me laugh, anyway.
That mental flip-flop was what I was going for with Safety Craig. Thing is, it still makes me laugh, but I must just not be telling it right.
There is also something else running with Safety Craig – in contrast to what you say about it being a ‘One Off’ gag – and that is I contemplated keeping it running to see if it picked up any momentum through repetition, as those things sometimes do. I don’t know if I will – I need to contextualize it a bit more and see if it’s worth it. But that’s the great thing about blogging. You can fail all you want because, after all, nothing really depends on it. And your friends stick by you no matter what.
Don’t they.
Guys.
Hey.
Anyone.
Hello…
[click]
……………..
……………
You have to be local to appreciate The League of Gentlemen.
I dont quite agree that th laugh in th Bee Joke depends on th cuss — tho I dont sppose anything othr than th cuss woud be AS effecktive. Whats essential is that th farmrs response be decidedly gruff. And maybe “Fuck em” works SO prfeckly because it is not only gruff but also so clearly that kind o disregard for anothr creatures comfort.
And that gets to anothr aspeckt o what I found especialy funny, namely th complete confidence wif which th Fuckem farmr misinterprets a question about efficiency as a question about comforts — and BEEs comforts, yet. So theres this mattr-of-fackt common-sense “Oh, I dont worry about THAT, do YOU?” aspeckt to th comment — all due to his single-minded “What else coud he mean?” misinterpretation.
Yeah. I dont sppose Ive quite hit it on th head neithr. But it sure is fun TRYIN.
I like that his name is Craig.
Cissy’s right. It might seem like a casual choice, but it is the Rev’s innate understanding of that type of humour that he chose to call him Craig (Doug would have worked well too).
Also, Black Books Rulez, OK!
Can the Yanks do what the Brits do? It does seem to be an anglophile sense of humour (though of course the Rev is a black Lithuanian Buddhist).
I think the Yanks can do it too – people like Steven Wright, say.
Ubuntu!