Mon 27 Oct 2014
Into the Woods Where Nothing’s Clear
Posted by anaglyph under Idiots, Movies, Music, Stupidity
[12] Comments
I’m partial to a good piece of musical theatre. Call it nostalgia, or call it sentiment, but like the idea of dramas brought to life with song. I grew up in a home where my mother was constantly rehearsing for one part or another so by osmosis I know all of West Side Story, the King & I, Oliver and numerous other stellar productions of the musical theatre ouvre. Later in my life I discovered the witty brilliance of Cole Porter and then the extraordinary talent of Stephen Sondheim, who became my favourite writer of musicals. ((Sondheim did of course work with the incomparable Leonard Bernstein on West Side Story, but he really began to shine when he started to compose music for his own lyrics.))
I’ve seen a few Sondheim works performed on stage – Into the Woods; A Little Night Music; Sweeney Todd – and heard most of them as recordings. I’m always intrigued when I hear that a musical is slated for a cinema treatment because I think they can work quite well in this form. I’m especially interested when it’s Sondheim. You’ll all no doubt remember that Tim Burton made a version of Sweeney Todd for the screen some years ago, starring the inimitable Johnny Depp. It’s not one of my favourite adaptations, but I didn’t hate it either.
What was kind of bizarre about the launch publicity for that film was that the initial few trailers didn’t portray any of the characters singing. Since Sweeney Todd is closer to an operetta than a musical – that is, the whole thing is pretty much sung – to produce such a trailer is not something you achieve without a great deal of contrivance.
People who weren’t expecting the film to be a musical were widely pissed off at this piece of disingenuous pretence and there were even official complaints made about it.
Now Disney is about to release a cinematic version of Sondheim’s Into the Woods – and they’ve done the exact same thing!
WHYYYYYYY?
I find it hard to imagine the kind of discussion that must have gone on in the Disney Marketing Department’s offices to arrive at this lumpen, meaning-challenged amputee of a trailer. Nevertheless, I will give it a try.
Disney Uber Marketing Boss: What we need is a trailer that will get EVERYONE to come see the film!
Disney Uber Marketing Boss’s Executive Researcher: But our data shows that everyone except senile old people and children hate musicals.
Disney Uber Marketing Boss: Then we have to FOOL people into coming into the cinema! ((Because that always works out well.))
Disney Uber Marketing Boss’s Executive Researcher: I guess so…
Disney Uber Marketing Boss: I know! We could make a trailer that has no singing in it! Make it look like a normal film.
Disney Uber Marketing Boss’s Executive Researcher: But it’s a musical. It’s all singing. Everyone sings. All the time.
Disney Uber Marketing Boss: Surely there are some bits where they don’t actually sing?
Disney Uber Marketing Boss’s Executive Researcher: Well, yes, there are three moments in the film where the words are sort of half-spoken… and I think once or twice there may be five or six seconds where Johnny or Meryl are about to sing but haven’t quite opened their mouths…
Disney Uber Marketing Boss: Excellent. Chuck in a few special effects and a guy saying ‘In a world beyond your imagination…’ and it’s sorted! Let’s get our editor onto it!
What I don’t understand is who, exactly, their lame, half-baked, non-singing trailer is aimed at? Into the Woods is a work that is based entirely on fairy tales – do they really believe that taking the music out will give them a chance with the vast goldmine of 14-25 year olds who rock up to see Guardians of the Galaxy? Do these daft studio executives think that they’ll somehow get an opening weekend of those people who’ll be sitting there in the dark and have some kind of popcorn-infused epiphany: ‘Hey, this singing instead of dialogue is THE BOMB!!! And then text all their friends: ‘Hey G!! This musical opera thing is cray sick. I totes can’t believe I thought it was gay!’
Even more perplexingly, if the studio isn’t committed to the idea of a musical, why the fuck did they make one in the first place? It’s not exactly something you do by accident. It’s almost like they’re embarrassed by it or something.
And the thing is, I reckon you could make a really great trailer with singing – it is after all almost a music video clip. I’ll even go one step further – I believe singing should be introduced into ALL movie trailers! You have to admit – for most of them it would improve things immeasurably. And it’s not like trailers are concerned anymore with giving you any idea of what the film is like.
Anna Kendrick sings in Pitch Perfect – BIG HIT.
Meryl sings in Mamma Mia – BIG HIT
What’s their problem?
I bet they don’t actually go to the movies.
Oh, also, Johnny’s passable in Sweeney Todd too. I think that basically what’s happened is that somewhere – around the early 1980s is my guess – someone passed around the idea that musicals are box office death and now no-one’s game to challenge that concept. Which is fine, BUT WHY ACTUALLY MAKE THEM if you think that’s going to be a problem. That’s the bizarre thing for me – someone green-lit this show as a musical, and now the marketing department is telling them they shouldn’t acknowledge that it’s a musical. Bonkers.
Musicals aren’t bad. I saw Man of La Mancha back in college as a play, and it was awesome. There’s a great light opera about 30 miles from here at a college, and I saw My Fair Lady there, and it too was pretty neat.
Then again, one wonders, what major Disney movies in the past 20 years aren’t bordering on musicals? I’ve not seen Frozen (I think that’s the title) but the one part people seem to remember is that song (which title I don’t recall) the protagonist sings. Disney is probably the one company that reasonably expect to show no music in a trailer and people still expect it to be a major part of most films they make. Lion King, Aladdin, Shrek, Little Mermaid, et cetera. And I think most trailers for those didn’t have much music either, but were cleary of a musical slant nonetheless.
But I’m not so familiar with Disney now. Just saying, they’re probably the one company people just expect to put a bunch of songs in a cinema piece, regardless of whether it is or not. Yeah, it’s disingenuous (disneygenuous? PUNS.) but it’s what major corporations do anymore, certainly not just movies…
I think they put animation into a separate category. Whether an animation has music or not seems to be irrelevant. It’s when actual people sing that they have problems.
Ah, in that case I’m lost indeed.
Don’t try to fathom it. No-one else does.
Also, is there any way to make it auto-notify with an opt-out on the comments, instead of the other way round as it is now?
I never remember to tick the box because it’s below the submit button, outside the comment submission box, just generally playing hide-and-seek with my linux taskbar….
Linguistically gifted (but dumb in every other way) Disney Marketing Genuis: “Thank god for sprechen singen, now we can make a trailer.’
Johnny Depp is a master of sprechen singen in Sweeney Todd. I think that’s why they allowed the one ‘sung’ bit from him in that first trailer. They figured they might get away with the audience thinking that it’s a Johnny ‘acting style’…