Tue 20 May 2008
A Lack of Pretext?
Posted by anaglyph under Gadgets, Grumpy Old Man, Rant, Technology
[12] Comments
I was loitering over at Radioactive Jam yesterday, where the Jamster was musing about an epiphenomenon of texting (namely ‘twittering’) and where he posed the following question:
What about you, my feiends? Do you use your phone for text messaging? If so how often, and how many people do you communicate with using text?
Well, for me, that question was like waving a red flag at a bull. Or, to be specific, since we evidently have so many pedants in our midst, like waving a Pantone 032 HC woven textile heraldic banner at a toro lidiado.
Because I absolutely detest texting. To me it seems like a useless 21st Century gimmick that will surely, and quite properly, go the way of CB Radio craze of the mid 1970s*. My reasons are many, and only one of them is because I’m a grumpy old geezer. Here are some others:
1: On a normal keyboard (that is, one designed for human fingers) I’m a pretty fast typist and it drives me absolutely BANANAS to try and tap out messages on those stupid little phone keypads. Especially when it is almost always faster and easier to dial the number and actually talk†to the recipient.
2: Predictive texting doesn’t help matters any. How many times have I sent a message to Violet Towne that says ‘DON’T WAIT FOR OF. I’LL BE GOOD LATE.’ or something equally as baffling. Additionally, the software for predictive texting (on my phone, at least) is written by an insane person. Let me give you an example: recently I was keying in a word, let’s say it was ‘hamster’ (because I can’t remember what it actually was – suffice to say it was a word in fairly common usage as opposed to, oh, quincunx, or something). Anyway I get as far as H-A-M-S… and the phone makes its irritating little ‘ping’ noise and says WORD NOT IN DICTIONARY. OK, so its dictionary doesn’t know hamster or hamstrung, even. Understandable, I suppose, if somewhat moronic. But then one day I find I’ve inadvertently keyed E-X-P-O-N-E-G-F-D-E-R and it’s still letting me merrily type away, with no advisory ‘ping’, as if somewhere, somehow, if I keep on adding on enough letters exponegfder… is suddenly going to turn into a word it retains in its feeble little nano-brain. What the fucking hell is that all about? It’s the kind of thing that can only happen because a mad person is at the controls.‡
3: I have a rare genetic disease¤ that means I am unable to write sentences without using punctuation or correct spelling. This slows texting down by nearly one million percent, because people who write the software for mobile phones are illiterate and don’t care about such things. So if you want to put an apostrophe or semi-colon in your text, you have to first have a Degree in Illogical Thinking to figure out how to do it, and second, spend an extra two minutes actually doing it.
4: Texting is the method nonpareil for avoiding taking responsibility for bad behaviour. Let me draw you a picture (and tell me this has never happened to you): you’ve just spent 30 minutes standing in the rain, chilled to the bone by a raging blizzard, fighting off drunken louts who seem to think they have more right to the taxi that you flagged down than you do, arrived at the cinema for a film that you really don’t care too much to see but which you’re prepared to endure because, well, you’re a good friend and you do that kind of thing, only to have your message alarm make its chirpy little beepity-beep-ta-ping!: ‘SORRY CANT MAKE IT 2NITE CATCH U L8R!!!’††When you try to call back, the phone goes straight to message bank. C’mon, hands up, who can relate to that? Even more pertinently, hands up who’s guilty of sending that message! Yes, just as I suspected.
Of course, in Ye Olde Days, being stood up in some similar fashion might have easily happened too, but back then we had GUILT™. In this new Age of Instant Communication, the text message somehow allows a weird kind of magical dispensation whereby the fink that ditched you can now be tucked up all warm and comfy on the couch at home with a tub of Cherry Garcia and the DVD Box Set of the Remastered Outer Limits Collector’s Edition and able to enjoy the rest of their evening somehow completely absolved of any remorse!
Because they texted you that they couldn’t make it.**
5: You don’t need even the smallest degree of commonsense to be allowed to use your phone to text. Last week I was traveling back along the airport freeway in the rain when a car just in front of me in the right-hand lane swerved so close that I was forced to slam on the brake to avoid a collision. As I slowed down, thanking the Spaghetti Monster that I was still in one piece, the culprit went weaving back into his own lane, oblivious to what had happened. Yes, you can guess what was going on. Whilst travelling at 100 kilometers an hour on a multi-lane freeway full of cars on a wet night, this idiot was texting someone. Not only that, I bet my entire Spam Fortune (which is quite considerable now – about 120 billion dollars at last count) that his message was something like ‘SORRY CANT MAKE IT 2NITE CATCH U L8R!!!’. This guy was equipped with a car, a phone and the English language, any one of which would been an obvious challenge for him to deal with on an individual basis let alone all at the same time.
Oh, there are many more reasons I could go on with but I’ll give it a rest now. Anyway, I can see you all twitching your fingers there below the table, undoubtedly Twittering something along the lines of ‘REVEREND A WAFFLING ON AGAIN PLUS CA CHANGE PLUS CEST LA MEME CHOSE’
(Does ANYONE see how pathetic and sad that phrase looks without the proper punctuation? Anyone? Sigh. I thought not).
___________________________________________________________________________
*Most of you won’t have a clue what I’m talking about unless you’re around my age. And there’s a very good reason for that.
†Yes, yes, I know that talking business is SO Last Century.
‡I’ve spoken previously about other aberrant behaviour in the predictive texting of my phone that gives weight to this theory.
¤Its technical name is ‘Education’.
††The multiple exclamation marks are mandatory in cases like this. They do not represent ‘punctuation’ as such, but instead are meant to evoke a sentiment something akin to ‘Oh I’m just SUCH a kooky crazy wacky kinda person and, gosh, life is just so topsy turvy, and like ANYTHING can happen really. Wow! How can you possibly hate me?’
**Seriously, if you ever bother to take the matter up with the fink the next day, the response is invariably one of indignation on their part: ‘What’s your problem – I texted you to let you know!’
___________________________________________________________________________
Ah Reverend, you know the nurse will ALWAYS be on your side when it comes to punctuation
Pedants of the world unite :-)
Is it just me or does the numeric permalink for this post seem to suggest an interesting attribution for the text messaging phenomenon?
I am with you there brother. I rarely text, basically only answering other text, which occurs once a month.
U shld know that language is an evolving thing bttr than NEone. The truly fasen8ing thing bout txting, (I know commas break the rules) at least to my anthro prof, is that its the 1st human language to have no audible analog.
I argued that you could find find all sorts of hieroglyphics all over the trails and canyons out here, and I’m sure the Utes, or the mysterious Pre-Utes, were not using any sort of phonic symbol.
B4 U judge teh kiddeez give txt 1 good try!!!!!!
There would be little to no point in using Pantone 032 HC. Although it is red, the HC associated with it stands for hexachrome. Hexachrome is Pantone’s six color printing process that uses green and orange in addition to to the standard cyan, magenta, yellow, and black.
There would be little to no point in printing your flag material utilizing this six color process. You’d want Pantone 032 TC. That is, assuming you’re making your flag out of Gossypium sp.
I think 032 would be a little garish to match an authentic bull-maddening flag. 186 is much closer.
What was the rest of the post about?
um, why do I get a question mark over the term DVD?
Nurse Myra: Yes, I am counting on you to make sure that when I finally go to my eternal rest, the epitaph on my tombstone is properly rendered.
Jam: I see what you mean. What’s rather more odd, though, is that Glitch didn’t make an appearance in this post. What’s even MORE annoying is that if I’d figured this out, I would have made this post my next post, and switched it with the one I’m writing now. To which I can only say DOH! (You’ll see what I mean if you tune in later)
Malach: Now I’m trying to figure out what kind of text requiring an imperative answer would arrive once a month…
Casey: I think yr prof is txting out his ass. First of all, texting is a ‘language’ just about as much as semaphore or telegrams are – it’s just an adjunct to an already existing system, designed for expedience by dispensing with structure. And anyway, how does your prof know that Egyptian heiro or Anasazi pictograms got spoken? I bet he is just the type of person who sends CANT MAKE IT 2NITE style messages.
Phoebe: Well despite my GOM ramblings, I do think text has a few conveniences, such as leaving thoughts that can be displaced in time without any real legacy, as you say. And a great one for me is sending myself texts to remind me of something. But I expect that last one to be utterly supplanted when I finally get my iPhone.
Atlas: Oh very well. Here’s my badge and my pen. You’re the new Pedant around here and no-one’s even coming close to calling you out in the high street at noon.
Pil: On my puter, when I leave my cursor over the word, the question mark disappears and I get a little label telling me that DVD means Digital Video Disk. This tells us that this is a part of the WordPress code made by a clever, and yet at the same time, stupid, person. Clever because they can make this kind of thing happen, and stupid because DVD actually stands for Digital Versatile Disk.
She did indeed text. Often. One of the stranger times i have had at this school.
Casey: Ah, yr prof is a ‘she’! My bad.
I use texting rarely. But I heard some American colleagues talking the other day, and they use texting in meetings so that they can text comments to “like minded” people in the meeting their “real” feelings about what is being discussed.
I laughed out loud.
Can I suggest one situation where Texting can be appropriate. If I am in a meeting where I cannot use the phone and I need to reply to someone who has just called so that I can give them an idea of how long it will be before I am available.
As I have an iPhone, texting is a joy Even though the keyboard is still small, at least it is QWERTY. The iChat way of viewing is also far superior to all other phones I have ever used. As per usual Apple makes a well designed piece of kit with an amazing OS.
I sent the Reverend a link some time ago to a Telstra spokesperson who was denigrating the iPhone and Apple, suggesting they should “stick to what they know” and leave phones to the manufacturers like Nokia etc. Well mate, I can’t wait to see you eat your words.
S.
hewhohears tracked down the link in question and I think we will be seeing a certain Mr Greg Winn putting mustard on those words and consuming them, along with a slice of humble pie that comes direct from the oven of shame, set at gas mark egg on your face.