Wed 3 Oct 2007
Calling a Spade a Shovel
Posted by anaglyph under Poetry, Words
[11] Comments
This morning, while listening to the radio I heard the following two items of interest:
The director of this year’s Young Writer’s Festival in Newcastle NSW, Nick Powell, was asked how the opening day went on Saturday and he declared enthusiastically that ‘it literally blew my mind!’
No, Nick, it really didn’t, because you’re talking to us on the radio. If it literally blew your mind you’d most likely be in a cold metal cabinet with a tag on your toe, and someone would be sloshing liberal quantities of Clorox over the Writer’s Festival office floors. It figuratively blew your mind, perhaps, and it seems to me that if it is incumbent on anyone to know difference between those two things it should be the director of a Writer’s Festival for chrissakes.
On the same show, reviewer Geoff Page dispensed some pearls of wisdom about poet Jane Gibian’s new collection Ardent.
There is considerable range here, from the mystery of the title poem… through certain semi-satirical works… to several impressive haiku and tanka sequences. These latter forms can be a trap for younger poets who take them to be easier to write than they are, especially since, quite reasonably these days, we ignore the strict syllabic requirements of the Japanese.
Whoa there boy!
When did it become quite reasonable to abandon the strict syllabic requirements of the haiku? I said it before about limericks, and I’ll say it again about haiku: you can forget all about the structure of the form if you like, but then the thing you’re writing is not a haiku!. It is a short non-rhyming poem. Or, being charitable maybe, a short haiku-like poem. BUT IT IS NOT A HAIKU.
Allow me to draw an analogy: an elephant is a big heavy grey mammal with four solid legs and a fearsome demeanour. If we ‘ignore the strict descriptive requirements’ of the biologists we could call it a rhinoceros. Indeed, an elephant even bears some superficial resemblances to a rhinoceros, but I put it to you Mr Page: you may disagree with the biologists about what it is, but that does not actually change anything in reality.
So. A traditional Japanese haiku is a poetry form such that three lines consist of five syllables, seven syllables and then five again. There are many variations of this form that are similar to haiku, such as senryu, haibun, kimo, scifaiku and waka, but here’s the thing – they are variations, and are not called haiku! That’s why they have other names.
The Reverend sighs
When those who keep the language
Are its greatest foes
Hitler has the right idea rouding up critics . .. Whoops did I say that?
That’s why we have need
of passionate Anaglyph
To maintain the rage.
Haiku is now dead.
I prefer to rhyme instead.
Long live limericks.
The writers of limericks fail
When “syl” counting makes them just quail
And as for the rhyme
And beating in time
Its failure makes me really rail!
Haiku was a fad
for those who had no rhyming
or even rhythm
Critics are just code for Demons, yes, yes
I think it is fine
to have the various kinds
of verse in one’s mind.
Syllables are for sissies.
Meter is for morons.
Rhyme-a-dime-a-ding-dong.
George Bush says today-
An elephant is haiku
If I say it is.
Malach:
If Adolf’s armies
Had instead cried ‘Sieg Haiku!’
Would they have triumphed?
Cissy Strutt:
There is no excuse
For mangling of the language
If words are your job.
jedimacfan:
Whilst haikus are fine
I agree that limericks
Are better by far!
Archie:
At the Tetherd Cow
Both kinds are acceptable
If penned correctly!
Pope:
The Devil’s forked tail
Must be handy in Hell for
Toasting marshmallows…
Catalyst:
Like I said above:
I’m all for the poetry,
Just stick with the rules!
Phoebe:
Whatever you choose –
Rhyme, meter or syllables –
Just make sure they’re right!
Colonel:
To reason with George
Would be something like bailing
Water with a sieve
the word “literal” is entirely overused. as is “seriously” and “ironically”. i think it’s easier to bastardize the english language, than use it properly
These conferences:
Make their founders wealthy, yes?
Let us imitate.