Fri 16 Feb 2007
Flying Shit Not a Hit With Fans
Posted by anaglyph under Art, Australiana, Bad Sydney Art
[19] Comments
I know you have all been waiting breathlessly for the second stop in the Bad Public Art Tour of Sydney and I don’t think you’ll be disappointed as we pull over here in Kings Cross just east of the city centre. Cameras on the ready?
This nine year old piece is one of the more controversial on our tour, and the controversy continues even to this day. Unveiled in 1998 to howls of outrage, sculptor Ken Unsworth’s ‘Stones Against the Sky’ quickly earned the alternative title ‘Poo On Sticks’.
There’s no getting around it. This is a monumentally ugly sculpture. If you have some idea of Unsworth’s other work, you can see what the general object was, but it has to be said that here he has failed spectacularly. In Unsworth’s defense, there was evidently an original plan for the sculpture to be sited among straight-trunked trees, and perhaps that might have mitigated the awful spectacle somewhat. Outside that context, however, it is one of the city’s more miserable artistic tragedies.
I have to admit that I am in general a big admirer of Unsworth’s work. He makes art that is whimsical, challenging and humorous and I would place him halfway along a sliding scale between Andy Goldsworthy and Len Lye. His wonderful ‘Suspended Stone Circle II’, in permanent exhibition at the Art Gallery of New South Wales, is a delightful achievement, and the illusion of the weightlessness of its large smooth river stones is at once impressive and charming.
Sadly though, ‘Poo On Sticks’ is likely to be the most widely encountered of Ken Unsworth’s creations, situated as it is in one of Sydney’s busiest centres. As I mentioned, the controversy over the piece continues. It has in recent times come under threat of urban terrorism ((A group of art students calling themselves the Revolutionary Council for the Removal of Bad Art in Public Places threatened to destroy the work. And no – I am not affiliated with this movement…)) and not too long ago it was clandestinely, and, I believe, with no consultation with the artist, given a drab coat of slate-grey paint (admittedly this does have the effect of removing the resemblance to big lumps of excrement, the boulders having been originally painted a shade of turd brown, but it does absolutely nothing to ameliorate the hideousness).
The moral to this story – when creating works for public display first ask yourself this question: “On a scale of 1 to 10, how close is my work to the physical resemblance of bodily waste?”
If you’re pushing 6, start again.
___________________________________________________________________________
Photographs ©Ginger Stick 2007 – thanks Cissy Strutt
I KNEW the next one was going to be Poo on Sticks. I didn’t know they had another name!
Uh-huh. So you were thinking that someone had intentionally sculpted sticks with poo stuck to them for public appreciation. Interesting. I’m inclined to think there is some validity in that approach. Still no taste, but validity.
Well someone has intentionally sculpted stones to look like poos.
Hmm. I don’t think they intended for them to look like poos. Actually.
I was once asked to use “ameliorate” in a sentence.Now I can.Thanks bro.
Words ‘R’ Us here at The Cow.
Even though the thing is ghastly, I am still affronted by the casual leaning of the Chinese restaurant chalk boards against the, ahem, artwork. I have been known to shout “It’s a Work of Art” at people putting rubbish into the Pig Bin sculpture in Adelaide (Cows passim).
Glad you did this one. Always hated it.
Somebody should sneak in and paint them green, then they’d be the Giant Floating Cabbage Heads.
Once that name stuck, people could name each one for a member of the Prime Minister’s Cabinet.
That is interesting art. It does look like Poo on a Stick. :LOL:
I am sure I could find some interesting art in my city too. Our new Art Gallery is quite the piece. It isn’t built yet but it will cost lots when it is done. Definitely not something that has been done before here.
Sirdar: Please don’t show any of the curators in your new art gallery Poo on Sticks! I can cope with it in Sydney (just) but I don’t think I could cope with it anywhere else!
No! I think we should have poo all round! Poo in Sydney! Poo in London! Poo in Montreal! A worldwide Poo Fest!
All this werk need is a bettr name.
I cast my vote fer Vlad Was Here.
See? Brillyance!
I still think they put these things in to function as eye-bashing meeting places. Meet you at the Poo on Sticks. You CAN’T miss it. No really, you can’t.
You have a point Bean. On the other hand, in a tasteful world, you could say ‘Meet you at the really beautiful and elegant new sculpture that looks nothing like bodily waste…’
They remind me of floating testicles.
It’s just weird. Flat weird.
Ah! The new name, now that they’re not brown anymore. Knackers on Sticks! Huzzah!
are the ‘oribble statues on the ANZAC bridge on your tour list? they give kitsch a bad name!
Ah, Gareth – I mentioned in my final post on this subject that I was by no means finished with Bad Sydney Art, but I stopped because I moved down to Melbourne. Where the public art is of a much higher calibre.